data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8257/a82575c8ab99fbf69c25863ccf0ac3ad7a6bb999" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/440bc/440bc9733692eb30194a4cc9a2d154af972b98d5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b22d/9b22dfd7d0ffafff5453629558b90474a0853cce" alt=""
Well guess what, Film Industry, I don't like it. I remember when an explosion was an explosion! It required demolition experts and it was quite an impressive spectacle and you cared for the hero to survive it because he wasn't "added-in later". No, it was live and real. The profession of the "Stunt Man" was a big deal. Car chases were legit, such as in the film Bullitt. Stuntmen risked their lives as portrayed in the film, Hooper. Both fine films. In the film, Sharkey's Machine, the world's highest free-fall was accomplished. Jackie Chan is not hyper-praised for his suffering whereas Jet Li who fakes almost everything is. It boggles the mind. Apparently, this Generation Zero likes sh*t.. possibly because they're made of it?..
![]() |
Actual stunt from Sharkey's Machine. You can see the pad at the bottom right. Rope was cut after this scene. 220 feet. No safety. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a75c/4a75ca26bbac6fe180ae1baa83a126869772e262" alt=""
When I watched Star Wars Episode 1,2,3 and Clone Wars in the theater, the later was a painful cinematic disappointment, I was not worried for any of the space-battles as they all looked like they were rendered on a PlayStation 2. I had no concerns for the video-game-like battle scenes because I was divorced from concern, "Oh, it's just not real. I'm not concerned at all. Just a game." I'm sure it cost a lot; probably way too much and George Lucas got suckered into paying it, case-in-point the embarrassing Jabba-the-Hutt in the digitally remade Star Wars Episode 4. The freshness date of these inclusions or CGI experiments is very short. Go back and watch The Matrix and it can't even hold-up to anything by today's standards. It's a parody of itself, now. Watch the remake of The Thing (1982) by John Carpenter, it's still awesome. The recent, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug film had a few CGI overkill moments as well. Remember that barrel scene from the chapter, "Barrels Out of Bond"? I do. There were no orcs in the book. No orcs. No ORCS! There was also not a chase. The wood-elves weren't stupid and would have devastated the attempt. In the story, they escaped quietly. More excuse for CGI for the retards. Spiderman 2 with Dr. Octopus was pretty bad when it came out, the physics were all wrong in some scenes, particularly with his capturing May Parker and climbing the building. Ugh. Now it's so painful you want to hunt it down like a Frankenstein's monster.
![]() |
Decland Mulholland as "Jabba" in Star Wars. Oh, wow! He looks so real! I saw this version in Maine in 1979. |
A ray of hope: I was told by some insider information the new Star Wars franchise will focus almost entirely on models and non-CGI work. This, to me, is amazing, and I bet it will do well despite JJ.Abrams getting his eye-burning lens-flare "technique" all over it. Maybe someone will not let him do that and allow some actual meaningful dialog, less Alec Guinness come back from the dead and smack him on the back of his head.
So when you watch a film, and there's a ton of CGI, and you LIKE it, remember, you're retarded. Don't have kids, because they'll take up the handicapped parking spaces that you should be in. CGI-tards. Now go watch 12 Angry Men (1957) to redeem yourself as penance, the exact opposite of CGI, filmed intentionally in black-and-white with only one set. Now that's acting. Boo hoo?! I don't like slow movies? I like CGI and my cell-phone and instant gratification and Whole Foods? Screw yourself, you stupid, non-contributing, cellphone sucking, media-sponge-tard.
Bye bye! ;D
![]() |
Spiderman 2 (1977) better than Spiderman 2 (2004) and Spiderman 2 (2014) |
Oh, and I got a haircut.
No comments:
Post a Comment